Micro NAB6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive393% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro NAB6  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen AHBNB
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '23 at 19:10
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 75.3
1-Core 195
2-Core 368
111% 213 Pts
4-Core 687
8-Core 1,059
108% 873 Pts
64-Core 1,364
84% 1,364 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4382
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 19.6
14% 19.8 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 22
Splatting 17.2
16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2311 2030 1500 1478 1152 905 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
393% Outstanding
Read 2,722
Write 2,513
Mixed 1,856
SusWrite 1,563
485% 2,163 MB/s
4K Read 74.3
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 110
358% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1855
DQ Write 1,623
DQ Mixed 1,710
1,290% 1,730 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 393%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE Kingston 9905744-108.A00G 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 35.2
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 26.7
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NAB6 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Micro NAB6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback