Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181029
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 16 '23 at 13:25
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 228
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 671
67% 544 Pts
64-Core 859
53% 859 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.8% Very good
Lighting 92.1
Reflection 94.2
Parallax 84.8
75% 90.4 fps
MRender 96.8
Gravity 85.6
Splatting 73.5
68% 85.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 62 122 121 103 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 481
Write 368
Mixed 309
SusWrite 145
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 19.3
74% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 83.1
DQ Mixed 44.4
48% 81.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 55%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
196GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 100 105 104 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 96
Write 80.2
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 103
117% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 64%
ADATA HD710 1TB
58GB free, PID a15a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 63 51 60 61 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 64.9
Write 109
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 60.4
95% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GIS GLOWAY TYA4U2666D19081C 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,079 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $417
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback