Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '23 at 12:09
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 214
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 646
64% 523 Pts
64-Core 795
49% 795 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74% Very good
Lighting 92.9
Reflection 94.3
Parallax 84.6
76% 90.6 fps
MRender 98.3
Gravity 89.5
Splatting 75.9
71% 87.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 6.1 7.8 95 119 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 476
Write 397
Mixed 317
SusWrite 75.7
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 15.6
61% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 87.2
DQ Mixed 37.5
46% 81 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 55%
ADATA HD710 1TB
171GB free, PID a15a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 33.8
Write 35.4
Mixed 14.9
SusWrite 38.7
41% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.4
103% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 45%
SPCCN PHD 640GB
148GB free, PID 1d40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 23 24 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 63.4
Write 24.3
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 23.1
43% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
47% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 18%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
135GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 22 21 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 38.7
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 21.7
42% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GIS GLOWAY TYA4U2666D19081C 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.6% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.6
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,079 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $417
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback