Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181029
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 06 '24 at 17:52
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 678
70% 565 Pts
64-Core 901
56% 901 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.4% Very good
Lighting 93.5
Reflection 94.4
Parallax 96.9
76% 94.9 fps
MRender 97.8
Gravity 86.2
Splatting 70.9
68% 85 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 2.1 6.2 11 38 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 492
Write 397
Mixed 311
SusWrite 75
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 19
66% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 67.1
DQ Write 87.5
DQ Mixed 39.9
40% 64.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 55%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
129GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 70 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 53.7
Write 53.7
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 69.8
82% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
162% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 64%
ADATA HD710 1TB
58GB free, PID a15a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 59 59 62 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
36% Below average
Read 74.9
Write 123
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 59.3
93% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.5
154% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GIS GLOWAY TYA4U2666D19081C 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 22
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 22.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 23 60 24.1" 1536 960 HWP286B HP ZR24w
Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,079 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $417
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback