Biostar H510MHP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar H510MHP  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '23 at 10:30
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$226
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 256
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 739
75% 607 Pts
64-Core 993
62% 993 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 1.4
3% 3.43 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nforce 51225 512GB-SSQD3
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0419A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 103 96 47 43 65 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76% Very good
Read 501
Write 430
Mixed 407
SusWrite 104
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 27.9
129% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 43.2
90% 177 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76%
Great: 78%
Seagate ST4000VX000-1F4168 4TB
207GB free
Firmware: CV14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 155 154 156 155 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 149
Write 152
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 154
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A1G43DB0-CPB Crucial CB8GU2666.C8RT 16GB
2133, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.4% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 20.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510MHP Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Biostar H510MHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback