Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 14 '23 at 20:46
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 196
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 516
53% 429 Pts
64-Core 526
33% 526 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39D0) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9125
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.9% Poor
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 37.6
32% 38.5 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 26
27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKKF25 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 123P Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 167 186 128 224 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 869
Write 583
Mixed 605
SusWrite 166
123% 555 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 47.4
169% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 40.2
97% 201 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 110%
Great: 236%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
571GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 110 107 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 64.7
Write 104
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 107
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
198% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFD824A.C16FF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 25.1
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 23.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 6,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback