Asus PRIME B660M-K D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B660M-K D4  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221014
Uptime21.5 Days
Run DateJun 13 '23 at 02:35
Run Duration399 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 72.5
1-Core 160
2-Core 298
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 949
89% 738 Pts
64-Core 1,183
73% 1,183 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
Asus(1043 8866) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 129
Parallax 144
117% 139 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 102
Splatting 97.3
91% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force TM8FPL500G 500GB
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM90.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1696 307 302 316 318 319 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,537
Write 2162
Mixed 1,517
SusWrite 543
324% 1,440 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 68.1
275% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,000
DQ Write 963
DQ Mixed 1,120
803% 1,028 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 222%
Great: 338%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
2GB free
Firmware: M6CR054
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 488
Write 418
Mixed 394
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 19.1
DQ Mixed 0.3
22% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
889GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 175 173 176 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 132
Write 142
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 173
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
189% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
794GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 105 102 106 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
49% Average
Read 67.7
Write 72.1
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 103
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49%
Great: 75%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 130 122 137 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 74.6
Write 95.8
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 126
71% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
250% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 97%
Asmt 2105 5TB
666GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 19 19 20 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 94%
JMicron Generic DISK00 8TB
313GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 41 40 42 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 111
Write 138
Mixed 114
SusWrite 39.2
136% 101 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.7
178% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 76%
JMicron Generic DISK01 16TB
5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 41 40 41 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 212
Write 185
Mixed 166
SusWrite 39.2
192% 150 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 1.5
533% 9.73 MB/s
DQ Read 3.2
DQ Write 13.2
DQ Mixed 1.3
505% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 109%
JMicron Generic DISK05 18TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 41 40 42 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89% Excellent
Read 196
Write 194
Mixed 179
SusWrite 39.2
198% 152 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 0.1
600% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 0.2
DQ Write 5.2
DQ Mixed 0.3
188% 1.9 MB/s
JMicron Generic DISK03 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 41 40 41 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 141
Write 156
Mixed 132
SusWrite 39.2
155% 117 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
209% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK02 8TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 41 40 42 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 83.2
Write 128
Mixed 100
SusWrite 39.2
121% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 0.9
361% 3.87 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 1
399% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 80%
JMicron Generic DISK04 5TB
666GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 41 40 42 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 136
Write 144
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 39.3
119% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
150% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 49%
JMicron Generic DISK07 3TB
329GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 41 40 42 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
Read 162
Write 139
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 39.3
134% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
JMicron Generic DISK06 8TB
11GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 41 40 42 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 134
Write 150
Mixed 111
SusWrite 39.2
143% 108 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
112% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 44.3
MC Mixed 39.5
123% 43.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 27.7
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B660M-K D4 Builds (Compare 2,941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B660M-K D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback