Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220225
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '23 at 06:06
Run Duration	379 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 67.4 1-Core 123 2-Core 236 77% 142 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 730 72% 587 Pts	64-Core 1124 70% 1124 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 22F7) CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.06 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.9% Below average	Lighting 41.6 Reflection 52.2 Parallax 65.4 34% 53.1 fps	MRender 56.3 Gravity 51.3 Splatting 41.8 40% 49.8 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$96 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 378GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 651 531 554 539 514 543 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 1,203 Write 886 Mixed 942 SusWrite 555 200% 897 MB/s	4K Read 43.2 4K Write 30.6 4K Mixed 27.2 116% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 691 DQ Write 76.1 DQ Mixed 115 152% 294 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 416GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 980 1120 1226 1327 1151 1216 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	204% Outstanding	Read 2,092 Write 1,131 Mixed 1,160 SusWrite 1,170 309% 1,388 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 25.8 101% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 756 DQ Write 63.8 DQ Mixed 98.5 151% 306 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 393%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 144GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 662 99 199 100 83 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 1,206 Write 816 Mixed 782 SusWrite 206 167% 753 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 24.8 4K Mixed 23.2 103% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 634 DQ Write 61.4 DQ Mixed 92.3 132% 262 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 255%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 149 158 132 146 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	90% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 159 Mixed 91 SusWrite 149 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 101%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121 553 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 559GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 111 95 103 173 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 19.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 50 30 24 28 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	40% Below average	Read 103 Write 101 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 36.8 50% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 51% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 105%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 132 141 129 141 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 144 Write 149 Mixed 99.6 SusWrite 136 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 101%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB 5,255 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 25 31 86 51 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	40% Average	Read 90.9 Write 92.6 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 47.5 54% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.6 160% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 69%
Seagate ST14000VN0008-2JG101 14TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 110 118 106 113 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 2% Great: 104%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 94 107 104 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	73.1% Very good	Read 151 Write 151 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 104 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.1 69% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 101%
JMicron Generic DISK03 10TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 22 26 17 23 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 64.4 Write 19.4 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 22.3 36% 31.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 10% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 89%
JMicron Generic DISK01 16TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 23 31 46 52 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 49.7 Write 12.7 Mixed 87.8 SusWrite 38 64% 47.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 144% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 109%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 88 106 94 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 38.5 Write 48.2 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 97.1 76% 53 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 73%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB 3,390 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 134 149 127 120 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 138 Write 140 Mixed 157 SusWrite 134 196% 142 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 2.6 237% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 100%
JMicron Generic DISK02 3TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 93 107 98 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 111 Write 91 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 101 117% 89.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GTZ CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GTZ 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.1% Good	MC Read 24.4 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 22.8 65% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 19.8 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,439x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	307x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	282x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	234x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	232x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	178x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	203x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $800

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)