Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 178%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 130%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive446% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 09 '23 at 18:24
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$329
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
130% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 221
2-Core 442
132% 253 Pts
4-Core 888
8-Core 1,595
149% 1,241 Pts
64-Core 3150
195% 3150 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 130%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A770
Intel(8086 1020) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Lighting 110
Reflection 120
Parallax 236
90% 155 fps
MRender 264
Gravity 193
Splatting 224
185% 227 fps
Poor: 88%
This bench: 118%
Great: 121%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2273 2736 2647 2882 2832 2915 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
446% Outstanding
Read 2,489
Write 2867
Mixed 2,665
SusWrite 2,714
607% 2,684 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 106
339% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 2,058
DQ Write 1,306
DQ Mixed 1,307
1,075% 1,557 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 446%
Great: 519%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
220GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 426 430 423 421 409 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 441
Mixed 385
SusWrite 428
97% 429 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 43.3
155% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 342
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
WD WD8003VRYZ-02MVAB1 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 142 138 141 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 185
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 140
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
274% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 120%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: SN06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 94 94 95 96 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 115
Write 111
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 95.3
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 105%
JMicron Generic DISK00 8TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 3.9 2.5 3.2 2.1 2.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 131
Write 140
Mixed 128
SusWrite 2.6
130% 100 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
203% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 76%
JMicron Generic DISK01 8TB
917GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 2.5 2.3 3 2.1 2.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 75.2
Write 124
Mixed 109
SusWrite 2.2
107% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
163% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24%
Great: 91%
JMicron Generic DISK02 8TB
674GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 3.8 2.6 3.1 2.1 2.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 80.5
Write 88.7
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 2.6
65% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.5
200% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 80%
JMicron Generic DISK03 8TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 163 155 168 165 152 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67% Good
Read 131
Write 150
Mixed 110
SusWrite 159
190% 138 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
172% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 67%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK04 8TB
930GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 3.8 2.6 3.1 2.2 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 111
Write 135
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 2.6
112% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
188% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31%
Great: 74%
JMicron Generic DISK05 8TB
996GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 4 2.5 3.1 2 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 89.1
Write 108
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 2.6
97% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
171% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 87%
JMicron Generic DISK06 8TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 4 2.2 3.1 2.1 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 132
Write 146
Mixed 126
SusWrite 2.6
132% 102 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
112% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 55%
JMicron Generic DISK07 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 161 160 172 168 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 139
Write 175
Mixed 129
SusWrite 162
210% 151 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
196% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-7200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 7200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
233% Outstanding
MC Read 97.5
MC Write 85.4
MC Mixed 93.7
263% 92.2 GB/s
SC Read 29.6
SC Write 54
SC Mixed 44.1
122% 42.6 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 149%
This bench: 233%
Great: 247%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM723F SAMSUNG
Typical GA-Z690 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 3,425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $995
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback