Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE  (all builds)
Memory15.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200617
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 21 '20 at 14:12
Run Duration343 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$191
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 832
83% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,048
65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 83.5
52% 72.2 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 64
Splatting 54.6
50% 61.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
636GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 875 357 924 958 963 949 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 2,325
Write 1,468
Mixed 1,367
SusWrite 838
333% 1,500 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 66
211% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 723
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 509
375% 505 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 233%
Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
2TB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 94 101 92 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 64.8
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 92
52% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.5
216% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 90%
WD WD50EZRZ-32RWYB1 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 48 51 50 49 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 102
Write 74.2
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 48.8
45% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Mixed 1.1
240% 1 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
930GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 50 51 50 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40% Average
Read 88.3
Write 88.4
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 49.2
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.6
221% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
4TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 50 51 50 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 41.9
Write 121
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 49.3
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.4
154% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 137 137 138 139 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 123
Write 149
Mixed 61.4
SusWrite 138
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 50 51 50 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 127
Write 97.4
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 49.3
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.8
217% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 87%
JMicron Generic DISK02 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 4.3 0.6 0.2 0.4 1.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 99.8
Write 130
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 1.4
83% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.6
245% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35%
Great: 80%
JMicron Generic DISK01 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 128 129 130 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 152
Write 151
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 128
174% 131 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 72%
JMicron Generic DISK03 8TB
6.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 127 129 130 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
64% Good
Read 166
Write 150
Mixed 112
SusWrite 128
184% 139 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 64%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK04 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 136 137 140 139 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 196
Write 204
Mixed 132
SusWrite 138
223% 168 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.9
239% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 74%
JMicron Generic DISK00 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 136 136 140 139 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 144
Write 165
Mixed 133
SusWrite 138
199% 145 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 79%
WD My Book 1230 5TB
2TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 119 120 119 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 115
Write 119
Mixed 78
SusWrite 119
146% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FAD BLS8G4D240FSA.16FARG BLS8G4D240FSA.16FARG BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FAD 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.7% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 24.1
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 25.2
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X CODE Builds (Compare 1,255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $889
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback