Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2  (all builds)
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '23 at 09:24
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 67
1-Core 141
2-Core 280
86% 163 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 811
83% 670 Pts
64-Core 1,054
65% 1,054 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.5.1
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.1% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 76.9
Parallax 130
52% 90.3 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 71.1
Splatting 32.7
56% 73.5 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3PSSD8 500GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,661
Write 1,842
Mixed 1,758
393% 1,753 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 84.3
296% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,238
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 118
275% 595 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 315%
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3256GNTD 256GB
177GB free
Firmware: EDFM00.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1178 528 268 267 268 267 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,078
Write 788
Mixed 1,069
SusWrite 463
190% 849 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 78.1
276% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 898
DQ Write 1,118
DQ Mixed 847
684% 954 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 201%
Great: 226%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
198GB free
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 203 200 200 200 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1226
Write 1,192
Mixed 1,145
SusWrite 244
213% 952 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 77.4
272% 97.6 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 1,125
DQ Mixed 650
576% 852 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 190%
Great: 220%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 3000 C16 Series 3000 C16 Series 3000 C16 Series 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.5% Good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 24.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2 Builds (Compare 2,953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback