TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '23 at 09:14
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 67.5
1-Core 141
2-Core 280
86% 163 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 818
84% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,087
67% 1,087 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 83.4%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Gigabyte(1458 2401)
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.5.1
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 76.7
Parallax 141
53% 94.3 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 32.8
55% 72.5 fps
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 53.8%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3PSSD8 500GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,643
Write 1,847
Mixed 949
330% 1,479 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 6.6
114% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 533
DQ Write 60.5
DQ Mixed 678
398% 424 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 315%
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3256GNTD 256GB
177GB free
Firmware: EDFM00.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1177 527 266 266 268 266 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,072
Write 743
Mixed 1,062
SusWrite 462
187% 835 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 77.4
273% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 901
DQ Write 1,114
DQ Mixed 848
684% 954 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑
This bench: 200%
 Great: 226%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
198GB free
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 203 198 200 200 201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,223
Write 1,187
Mixed 1,132
SusWrite 243
212% 946 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 77.1
270% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 784
DQ Write 1,123
DQ Mixed 652
578% 853 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑
This bench: 190%
 Great: 220%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 3000 C16 Series 3000 C16 Series 3000 C16 Series 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.1% Good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 25.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 24.2
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 67.1%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2 Builds (Compare 2,953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples719x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples336x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples258x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples287x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples173x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples153x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples67x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples66x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples65x
RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples138x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples118x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples99x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback