HP EliteDesk 800 G3 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G3 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8298
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '23 at 06:22
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 230
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 626
64% 517 Pts
64-Core 638
40% 638 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 8298) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 7.4
6% 7.43 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 12.5
9% 10.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDSE1TB 1TB
712GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1119B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 356 374 373 343 277 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 321
Write 345
Mixed 332
SusWrite 346
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 37.5
120% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 155
169% 285 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.8% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.3
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G3 TWR Builds (Compare 975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G3 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback