ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Precision 7820 Tower

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	95.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago.

System	Dell Precision 7820 Tower (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 05WNJ2
Memory	121.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '23 at 01:46
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6148 176 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU0, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 73.4 1-Core 109 2-Core 207 73% 130 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 730 65% 549 Pts	64-Core 2239 139% 2239 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000 8,562 User benchmarks, average bench 89% Dell(1028 11B2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (121 fps cap detected)	95.1% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 121 Parallax 122 98% 121 fps	MRender 97.6 Gravity 120 Splatting 107 89% 108 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 54,201 User benchmarks, average bench 449% 823GB free (System drive) Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1958 1880 1879 2062 2062 2058 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	310% Outstanding	Read 2,080 Write 2,209 Mixed 1,951 SusWrite 1,983 464% 2,056 MB/s	4K Read 60.2 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 71.5 244% 82.2 MB/s	DQ Read 748 DQ Write 607 DQ Mixed 694 515% 683 MB/s
Poor: 249% ↑ This bench: 310% Great: 623%
Mushkin MKNSSDSE1TB 1TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 826GB free Firmware: 6ANR SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 461 462 462 462 460 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 462 Mixed 417 SusWrite 456 103% 458 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 83.8 4K Mixed 49 159% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 289 235% 332 MB/s
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 113%
Toshiba MG03ACA400 4TB 722 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 3.5TB free Firmware: FL1D SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 165 166 166 164 164 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 157 Mixed 66.6 SusWrite 165 100% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA84GR7JJR4N-VK HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK 127GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	62.2% Good	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 21.6 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 6.5 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Precision 7820 Tower Builds (Compare 741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: Dell Precision 7820 Tower

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41101stBench 62%, 546 samples	58x
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41141stBench 63%, 670 samples	51x
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 51181stBench 65%, 220 samples	34x

GPU
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	77x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	52x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	39x

SSD
PC711 SK hy 1TBNvmeBench 274%, 247 samples	22x
PM9A1 Samsu 1TBNvmeBench 280%, 246 samples	17x
PM9A1 Samsu 512GBNvmeBench 264%, 261 samples	16x

RAM
HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK 4x8GBHynixBench 84%, 1,278 samples	47x
HMA81GR7CJR8N-XN 4x8GBHynixBench 72%, 107 samples	35x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 4x8GBMicronBench 76%, 499 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback