Asus H61M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H61M-E  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '23 at 18:13
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 177
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 482
50% 401 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.3% Very good
Lighting 89.6
Reflection 88.5
Parallax 81.2
73% 86.4 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 69.9
68% 85.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 76 103 111 86 97 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.6% Above average
Read 233
Write 182
Mixed 200
SusWrite 109
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 26.5
96% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 111
103% 157 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-043.A00LF 99U5584-005.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.1% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 10.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-E Builds (Compare 1,074 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-E - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $163
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback