Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Aquarius Pro, Std, Elt Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P8B75-M
Memory	8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '23 at 20:59
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Memory 70.2 1-Core 80.3 2-Core 140 58% 97 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 253 33% 248 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 535.98 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.4% Average	Lighting 59.3 Reflection 89.9 Parallax 56.9 48% 68.7 fps	MRender 63.9 Gravity 59.6 Splatting 56.2 49% 59.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$52 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 53 46 72 30 77 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.2% Poor	Read 174 Write 164 Mixed 176 SusWrite 69.4 33% 146 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 13.9 46% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 74.3 DQ Write 48 DQ Mixed 41.5 36% 54.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 837GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 168 165 162 166 167 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 172 Mixed 87 SusWrite 164 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 109%
Sony Storage Media 16GB 1,582 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 11GB free, PID 05ba Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 5.1 7 7.2 7.2 4.4 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	4.71% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 0.2 Mixed 8.7 SusWrite 6.3 9% 8.57 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.71% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PSD34G133381 8325 FLGE85F-C8KMB 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.9% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 13.4 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 8.9 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	3x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4G 8GBSamsungBench 36%, 6 samples	5x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	2x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $454

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16