Csl-computer 761

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 280%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 303%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics233% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCsl-computer 761  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Z690-P WIFI
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '23 at 19:02
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$235
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 87.8
1-Core 215
2-Core 428
127% 244 Pts
4-Core 859
8-Core 1,430
140% 1,145 Pts
64-Core 2,491
154% 2,491 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 124%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$767
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
233% Outstanding
Lighting 332
Reflection 329
Parallax 340
271% 334 fps
MRender 478
Gravity 293
Splatting 213
255% 328 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 233%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1930 778 555 506 512 515 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,672
Write 1,659
Mixed 1,134
SusWrite 799
295% 1,316 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 65
229% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 1,832
DQ Write 1,520
DQ Mixed 1,671
1,253% 1,674 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 261%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1707 1693 1353 914 922 917 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 1,623
Write 1,650
Mixed 1,198
SusWrite 1,251
322% 1,431 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 69.7
242% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 2,216
DQ Write 1,704
DQ Mixed 1,891
1,433% 1,937 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 303%
Great: 372%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
931GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1555 1553 1578 1553 1555 1543 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 1,193
Write 1,517
Mixed 1,338
SusWrite 1,556
318% 1,401 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 66.6
236% 90 MB/s
DQ Read 1,932
DQ Write 1,637
DQ Mixed 1,657
1,276% 1,742 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 295%
Great: 365%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 176 183 180 186 181 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 71.3
Write 154
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 178
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
60% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 106%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
49GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 41 15 16 16 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 118
Write 12.2
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 26.2
47% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.1
86% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3038F162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
195% Outstanding
MC Read 81.5
MC Write 76.8
MC Mixed 72.1
219% 76.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 51.6
SC Mixed 33.2
104% 36.5 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 151%
This bench: 195%
Great: 263%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 761 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 339%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 368%
UFO

System: Csl-computer 761

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback