Gigabyte GA-MA785GT-UD3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA785GT-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20091203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '23 at 14:17
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 48.3
2-Core 82.4
46% 69 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 167
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.75% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 2.8
1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.75%
Great: 1%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470
Nvidia(10DE 079F) 1.2GB
CLim: 607 MHz, MLim: 837 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 7
13% 17.6 fps
MRender 30.2
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 19.7
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,484
Write 1,732
Mixed 1,865
450% 2,027 MB/s
4K Read 247
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 78.3
514% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 380
DQ Mixed 511
341% 406 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung SP1654N 160GB
143GB free
Firmware: BV100-45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 48 48 48 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 40.6
Write 43
Mixed 30
SusWrite 47.9
30% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 33%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
450GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 141 132 132 138 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 127
Write 134
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 136
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.7% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA785GT-UD3H Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA785GT-UD3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback