Gigabyte GA-MA785GT-UD3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA785GT-UD3H (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20091203
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '23 at 13:58
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Memory 80.9 1-Core 49.6 2-Core 95.3 49% 75.3 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 175 23% 173 Pts	64-Core 168 10% 168 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
ATI Radeon HD 4200 10,090 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.75% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 1 1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.75% Great: 1%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470 5,537 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 079F) 1.2GB CLim: 607 MHz, MLim: 837 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Lighting 15.8 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 7.1 13% 17.7 fps	MRender 30.2 Gravity 15 Splatting 19.7 17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,989 Write 1,502 Mixed 1,478 368% 1,656 MB/s	4K Read 218 4K Write 64.9 4K Mixed 60.4 442% 114 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 431 281% 325 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung SP1654N 160GB 267 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 143GB free Firmware: BV100-45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 46 48 48 48 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 39.9 Write 43 Mixed 29.6 SusWrite 47.7 30% 40 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 33%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 450GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 123 102 115 135 134 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 124 Write 128 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 123 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.3% Poor	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.93 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 8.7 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-MA785GT-UD3H Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA785GT-UD3H

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	28x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	18x
Athlon II X4 620AMDBench 44%, 5,981 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	11x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	6x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x
Trion 150 240GBOCZ $196Bench 79%, 15,660 samples	4x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x

RAM
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	14x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	14x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $121

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16