Acer Predator G3-571

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G3-571  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienta_KLS
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171226
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJun 08 '23 at 01:27
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 159
56% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 383
39% 316 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 118B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3598
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.3% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 46.1
48% 58.1 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 60.1
Splatting 61.6
51% 62.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 900 844 857 841 802 733 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,830
Write 1,445
Mixed 1,369
SusWrite 829
306% 1,368 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 45.6
147% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 472
338% 437 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 188%
Great: 355%
Toshiba MK6476GSX 640GB-$299
596GB free
Firmware: GS001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 64 64 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 65.1
Write 67.1
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 67.7
40% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 8502 PSD48G213381S 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.3% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-571 Builds (Compare 1,575 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Acer Predator G3-571

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback