Acer Predator G3-571

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G3-571  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienta_KLS
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171226
Uptime4 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 00:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 158
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 345
37% 296 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 118B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3203
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.8% Average
Lighting 59.1
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 59.8
48% 62.2 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 45.3
Splatting 62.2
47% 57.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 926 840 812 843 821 756 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,752
Write 1,526
Mixed 1,418
SusWrite 833
310% 1,382 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 41.5
152% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 587
DQ Write 423
DQ Mixed 587
416% 532 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 190%
Great: 355%
Toshiba MK6476GSX 640GB-$299
596GB free
Firmware: GS001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 73 73 73 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 67.1
Write 61.7
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 72.7
40% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 8502 PSD48G213381S 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.5% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 18.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-571 Builds (Compare 1,575 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Acer Predator G3-571

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback