MSI MAG B460M MORTAR (MS-7C82)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics89.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C82
MotherboardMSI MAG B460M MORTAR (MS-7C82)  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '23 at 13:30
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 278
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 913
89% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,413
88% 1,413 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
Nvidia(10DE 1536) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.1% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 113
Parallax 115
92% 113 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 96.7
Splatting 84.1
84% 106 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Verico SSD 240GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 140 25 75 57 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 504
Write 421
Mixed 362
SusWrite 86.2
76% 343 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 21.6
126% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 29.3
77% 157 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 92%
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: SBI02105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1402 1487 1558 1550 1555 1563 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,110
Write 1,584
Mixed 1,447
SusWrite 1519
373% 1665 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 44
202% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,126
DQ Write 940
DQ Mixed 768
648% 945 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 283%
Great: 323%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
846GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 200 197 199 199 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 198
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 198
123% 169 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
131GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 83 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 104
Write 99.8
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 84.4
65% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BA16G3200D4TP18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 21.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 22.2
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B460M MORTAR (MS-7C82) Builds (Compare 2,078 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MAG B460M MORTAR (MS-7C82)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback