Micro NAB6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive357% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro NAB6  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen AHBNB
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '23 at 21:42
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 190
2-Core 367
110% 211 Pts
4-Core 689
8-Core 1,074
109% 882 Pts
64-Core 1,422
88% 1,422 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 22.2
Parallax 18.5
13% 18.9 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 16.4
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0 512GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3112 3261 3135 355 355 356 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 1,544
Write 2,932
Mixed 2,003
SusWrite 1,762
468% 2,060 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 345
4K Mixed 87.7
391% 165 MB/s
DQ Read 1,801
DQ Write 1,373
DQ Mixed 1,626
1,205% 1,600 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 357%
Great: 399%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 35.1
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 25.6
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NAB6 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Micro NAB6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback