Gigabyte GA-Z590 VISION D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive548% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 VISION D  (all builds)
Memory18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '23 at 19:16
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 91.1
1-Core 164
2-Core 316
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 1,168
108% 904 Pts
64-Core 1,589
98% 1,589 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
6.36% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 9
6% 9.53 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 7.7
7% 8.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.36%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010603 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1906 1897 1912 1925 1946 1886 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
548% Outstanding
Read 2,337
Write 1,773
Mixed 2,095
SusWrite 1912
456% 2,029 MB/s
4K Read 286
4K Write 247
4K Mixed 247
880% 260 MB/s
DQ Read 1599
DQ Write 1,393
DQ Mixed 1,476
1,112% 1,489 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 548%
Great: 559%
Intel SSDPED1D480GAH 480GB
330GB free
Firmware: E201HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2036 2076 2042 2070 2038 2067 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
581% Outstanding
Read 2,319
Write 2,122
Mixed 2,234
SusWrite 2,055
492% 2,182 MB/s
4K Read 289
4K Write 268
4K Mixed 274
932% 277 MB/s
DQ Read 1,738
DQ Write 1,555
DQ Mixed 1,617
1,221% 1,637 MB/s
Poor: 309%
This bench: 581%
Great: 575%
Seagate ST12000NE0008-2JL101 12TB
77GB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 106 104 107 103 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
48GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 91 91 83 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 54.4
Write 81.2
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 87.2
54% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.5
189% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
140GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 110 106 113 102 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 47.7
Write 103
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 107
62% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
222% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
42GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 93 98 96 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 53.7
Write 95.9
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 94.7
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.5
203% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 90%
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB
412GB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 54 54 54 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 46.9
Write 55.6
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 53.8
68% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 30.3
104% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 33.4
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 103%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z590 VISION D Builds (Compare 929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 208%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 VISION D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,021
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback