Gigabyte GA-Z590 VISION D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive548% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 VISION D  (all builds)
Memory18.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '23 at 14:55
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 165
2-Core 332
102% 193 Pts
4-Core 660
8-Core 1,173
110% 917 Pts
64-Core 1,224
76% 1,224 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
6.24% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 12
Parallax 8.7
6% 9.27 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 7.6
7% 8.83 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.24%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010603 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1695 1725 1724 1737 1748 1757 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
548% Outstanding
Read 2257
Write 1,923
Mixed 2,089
SusWrite 1731
450% 2,000 MB/s
4K Read 272
4K Write 242
4K Mixed 253
865% 256 MB/s
DQ Read 2,020
DQ Write 1,778
DQ Mixed 1,858
1,404% 1,885 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 548%
Great: 559%
Intel SSDPED1D480GAH 480GB
330GB free
Firmware: E201HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1964 1998 2000 2004 1995 1989 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
577% Outstanding
Read 2,296
Write 2,057
Mixed 2,174
SusWrite 1,992
480% 2,130 MB/s
4K Read 276
4K Write 250
4K Mixed 259
882% 262 MB/s
DQ Read 2,147
DQ Write 1,905
DQ Mixed 1,989
1,502% 2,014 MB/s
Poor: 309%
This bench: 577%
Great: 575%
Seagate ST12000NE0008-2JL101 12TB
81GB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 106 106 106 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
50GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 87 90 99 101 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 63.1
Write 91.9
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 89.2
58% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
194% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
141GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 119 122 112 107 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 66.1
Write 104
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 109
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
205% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
43GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 94 98 96 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 57.4
Write 84.6
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 95.4
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.5
193% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 24.5
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 21
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z590 VISION D Builds (Compare 929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 208%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 VISION D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,021
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback