Gigabyte GA-Z590 VISION D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive532% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 VISION D  (all builds)
Memory16.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 10 '23 at 14:41
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 164
2-Core 326
105% 194 Pts
4-Core 643
8-Core 1,156
108% 900 Pts
64-Core 1,550
96% 1,550 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010603 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1705 1640 1698 1656 1658 1689 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
532% Outstanding
Read 2,215
Write 1,915
Mixed 2,058
SusWrite 1,674
442% 1,966 MB/s
4K Read 280
4K Write 246
4K Mixed 260
888% 262 MB/s
DQ Read 1,653
DQ Write 1,319
DQ Mixed 1,432
1,086% 1,468 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 532%
Great: 559%
Intel SSDPED1D480GAH 480GB
330GB free
Firmware: E201HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1925 1922 1932 1980 2009 2000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
571% Outstanding
Read 2,283
Write 2,061
Mixed 2216
SusWrite 1,961
480% 2,130 MB/s
4K Read 291
4K Write 263
4K Mixed 274
931% 276 MB/s
DQ Read 1,736
DQ Write 1,431
DQ Mixed 1,530
1,160% 1,566 MB/s
Poor: 309%
This bench: 571%
Great: 575%
Seagate ST12000NE0008-2JL101 12TB
81GB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 106 105 106 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
50GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 125 90 99 157 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 58.7
Write 121
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 120
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
224% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
141GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 175 179 183 183 183 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 50.4
Write 45.7
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 175
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.4
177% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
43GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 139 137 143 134 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 59.9
Write 93.5
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 138
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
216% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 90%
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB
412GB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 72 72 72 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 71.8
Write 69.2
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 71.8
90% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.7
265% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 29.5
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 31.1
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z590 VISION D Builds (Compare 929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 208%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 VISION D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,021
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback