Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory16.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 04 '23 at 13:55
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 86.4
1-Core 36.4
2-Core 264
67% 129 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 837
83% 676 Pts
64-Core 1,401
87% 1,401 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2327 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.8% Good
Lighting 75.4
Reflection 80.3
Parallax 76.1
61% 77.3 fps
MRender 79
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 72.6
62% 76.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
621GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 901 503 502 503 504 505 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
182GB free
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,254
Write 402
Mixed 617
234% 1,091 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 16.6
103% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 837
DQ Write 13.3
DQ Mixed 25
118% 292 MB/s
Poor: 139% Great: 271%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
463GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 130
Write 186
Mixed 74.5
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
589GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 21.6
Mixed 33.8
39% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
664% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 152
Write 16.4
Mixed 24.2
47% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
943% 7.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G KHX3200C16D4/16GX KHX2666C16/8G 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 10.7
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $793
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback