Lenovo 2756N1G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2756N1G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '23 at 08:26
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 139
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 220
30% 221 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3084) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.25% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.8
2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.25%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 63 59 54 56 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 7.5
Write 42.2
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 53.7
23% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 69%
WD My Book 500GB
101GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 39 40 40 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
21% Poor
Read 37.1
Write 36.6
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 39.9
47% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 Hynix HMT425U6AFR6C-PB 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.2% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.5
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2756N1G Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2756N1G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback