Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics82.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '23 at 05:53
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 98
2-Core 179
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 468
48% 388 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
MSI(1462 3236) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.2% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 118
Parallax 104
84% 108 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 101
Splatting 92.9
80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$230
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 376
Write 338
Mixed 302
75% 339 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 35.3
116% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 43.1
DQ Write 91.5
DQ Mixed 59.6
48% 64.7 MB/s
Poor: 89% Great: 133%
Hitachi HDN728080ALE604 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: A4GNW91X
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 125
Write 128
Mixed 58
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.9
201% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 110%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 129
Write 112
Mixed 14.1
61% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 859B CT102464BA160B.C16 859B CT102464BA160B.C16 859B CT102464BA160B.C16 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.2% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.8
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,516 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $906
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback