Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	82.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M (all builds)
Memory	26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '23 at 05:44
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 91.1 2-Core 159 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 396 41% 331 Pts	64-Core 448 28% 448 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% MSI(1462 3236) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 535.98 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.3% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 118 Parallax 104 84% 108 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 101 Splatting 91.6 79% 97.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$230 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 880GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 52 49 36 37 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 395 Write 354 Mixed 283 SusWrite 46.3 60% 270 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 30 101% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 32.1 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 44 40% 59 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 133%
Hitachi HDN728080ALE604 8TB 1,150 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: A4GNW91X SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 31 29 29 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 124 Write 138 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 29.1 65% 88 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 110%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1.5TB free Firmware: MJAOA5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 127 126 128 125 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Read 128 Write 112 Mixed 26.6 SusWrite 127 71% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 859B CT102464BA160B.C16 859B CT102464BA160B.C16 859B CT102464BA160B.C16 32GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 16.3 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 17.2 46% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,516 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	392x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	206x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	133x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	103x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	90x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	64x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	44x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 19,522 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $906

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359