Alaska A_M_I_

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAlaska A_M_I_  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221101
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJun 02 '23 at 21:30
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10710U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 40.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 159
55% 101 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 479
49% 395 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 6.8
4% 6.8 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.1
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NS512GSSD530 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0323A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1130 1222 1194 1201 1241 1238 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,476
Write 1,025
Mixed 880
SusWrite 1,204
257% 1,146 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 16.2
96% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 332
249% 332 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 175%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.3
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 8.2
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_M_I_ Builds (Compare 598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Alaska A_M_I_

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback