Alaska A_M_I_

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlaska A_M_I_  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 22:22
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10710U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 20.3
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 215
54% 112 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 375
42% 331 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 6
4% 5.9 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 11.9
7% 7.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NS512GSSD530 512GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0323A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1209 1135 1236 1171 1132 1054 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,596
Write 933
Mixed 858
SusWrite 1,156
254% 1,136 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 17.3
107% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 430
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 398
296% 394 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 183%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14.5
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 14.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 318
13% 318 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_M_I_ Builds (Compare 598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Alaska A_M_I_

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback