Alaska A_M_I_

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAlaska A_M_I_  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 22:27
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10710U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 36.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 146
52% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 204
22% 175 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 6
4% 5.97 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 7.9
6% 6.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NS512GSSD530 512GB
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0323A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1090 1174 1160 1034 1007 1056 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,385
Write 826
Mixed 792
SusWrite 1,087
229% 1,022 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 14.3
82% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 275
205% 272 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 157%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 5.3
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_M_I_ Builds (Compare 598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Alaska A_M_I_

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback