Monster TULPAR T7 V19.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V19.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V19.3
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '23 at 13:46
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 197
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 628
61% 503 Pts
64-Core 835
52% 835 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1065) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3598
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.1% Good
Lighting 81.8
Reflection 123
Parallax 77.5
67% 94.2 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 76.4
Splatting 70.4
65% 80.9 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 912 648 647 641 626 517 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 2,084
Write 1803
Mixed 1,376
SusWrite 665
331% 1,482 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 54.5
176% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 737
DQ Write 495
DQ Mixed 643
472% 625 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 206%
Great: 296%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
232GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 84 83 84 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 92.9
Write 86.7
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 83.6
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 71%
Seagate Ultra Slim GD 1TB
220GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 39 39 40 41 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 29.8
Write 30.7
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 39.2
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905744-113.A01G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.5% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 18.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V19.3 Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V19.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback