Lenovo F0CE000AUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo F0CE000AUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Gardenia CRB
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 00:44
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9210 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Memory 19.5
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 54.3
21% 37.3 Pts
4-Core 53.8
8-Core 18.1
6% 36 Pts
64-Core 54.7
3% 54.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Legend(17AA 36BD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 4
2% 3.47 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 53 65 73 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 95.7
Write 111
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 65.2
61% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FP 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 324
12% 324 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback