Lenovo F0CE000AUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo F0CE000AUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Gardenia CRB
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170206
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 15 '23 at 04:20
Run Duration401 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9210 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 58.8
1-Core 4.3
2-Core 9.5
22% 24.2 Pts
4-Core 10.1
8-Core 9.6
1% 9.85 Pts
64-Core 1.5
0% 1.5 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Legend(17AA 36BD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.45% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 3.7
2% 3.27 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.3
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.45%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 70 84 86 72 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 61.9
Write 71.8
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 79.2
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 109%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 4GB
4GB free, PID 0048
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.5 3.6 3.9 3.6 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 2.3
SusWrite 3.5
4% 3.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FP 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
3.14% Terrible
MC Read 0.2
MC Write 0.3
MC Mixed 0.3
1% 0.27 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 0.9
SC Mixed 0.4
2% 0.53 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 7 60 23" 1920 1080 LEN1201 LEN-510A-B
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback