Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1165G7 51,565 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Memory 43.9 1-Core 138 2-Core 207 69% 130 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 355 47% 351 Pts	64-Core 275 17% 275 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? MSI(1462 12E0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864 Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Lighting 13.5 Reflection 22.3 Parallax 19 11% 18.3 fps	MRender 19.6 Gravity 21.6 Splatting 15.5 15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 20%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB 33,645 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 365GB free (System drive) Firmware: P6MA001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 850 923 954 1047 998 1007 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	212% Outstanding	Read 1,280 Write 1,079 Mixed 935 SusWrite 963 239% 1,064 MB/s	4K Read 53.8 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 72.9 250% 89.6 MB/s	DQ Read 615 DQ Write 463 DQ Mixed 263 272% 447 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 212% Great: 247%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE 1x16GB 7,175 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 8.2 28% 9.77 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 5.3 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 185 22% 185 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-1165G7IntelBench 66%, 51,565 samples	100x
Gen Intel Core i5-1155G711thBench 66%, 4,814 samples	37x
Core i5-1135G7IntelBench 68%, 82,426 samples	34x

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	157x
GeForce MX450NvidiaBench 28%, 2,532 samples	31x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 9%, 39,662 samples	9x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GBKingstonBench 135%, 20,980 samples	93x
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	57x
OM8PCP31024F-AI1 1TBKingstonBench 179%, 2,896 samples	12x

RAM
M471A2G43AB2-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 7,175 samples	60x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GBHynixBench 46%, 20,752 samples	28x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples	27x