ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel D34010WYB

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	7.57% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	INTEL_ D34010WY
Motherboard	Intel D34010WYB (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20161116
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '17 at 00:52
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4010U-$280 12,162 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10% Very poor	Memory 1.85 1-Core 25.7 2-Core 65.8 14% 31.1 Pts	4-Core 98.5 8-Core 131 15% 115 Pts	64-Core 128 8% 128 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2054) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4332 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	2.28% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3.62 Parallax 4.03 2% 3.32 fps	MRender 3.52 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 5.52 3% 3.52 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.28% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ APEX 63GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0955 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (C2) HDA temperature 44 50 90194313260	7.57% Terrible	Read 108 Write 21 Mixed 25.5 11% 51.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.75 4K Write 0.87 4K Mixed 0.71 7% 1.78 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.57% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3N169ES4.16FE 1x8GB 220 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 10 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 2.5 6% 2 GB/s	Latency 487 8% 487 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback