TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Mustek6376 H81M-S2PV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMustek6376 H81M-S2PV  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H81M-S2PV
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140812
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 28 '23 at 19:19
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 55%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 75.1
2-Core 126
54% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 189
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 49.8%
 Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
PwrHis(1787 D580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.4% Above average
Lighting 67.1
Reflection 64.5
Parallax 95.7
55% 75.8 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 45.7
45% 56.5 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 51.4%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Rogueware 2.5" SATA NX100S 512GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 234 77 55 35 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 402
Write 362
Mixed 337
SusWrite 116
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 20.2
85% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 43.2
81% 156 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 58.3%
 Great: 94%
Jmicron Generic 1TB
94GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 40 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 49.9
Write 39.1
Mixed 31
SusWrite 40
30% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 25.9%
 Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KF1600DDAD3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
47.5% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.9
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 47.5%
 Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H81M-S2PV Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Mustek6376 H81M-S2PV

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel  $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples12x
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples7x
Core i7-4770Intel  $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples2x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples10x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples5x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples2x
SSD
SSD220 240GBTranscend  $41Bench 71%, 12,548 samples3x
BX500 240GBCrucial  $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples3x
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples3x
RAM
M378B5273TB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 120 samples4x
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 6,401 samples3x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback