ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Precision 7960 Tower

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	411% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	1024GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 1024GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Dell Precision 7960 Tower (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 01G0M6
Memory	995.5 GB free of 1024 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230327
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 27 '23 at 06:41
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon w7-3465X 23 User benchmarks, average bench 88% CPU0, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Memory 73.1 1-Core 196 2-Core 384 112% 218 Pts	4-Core 661 8-Core 1,233 113% 947 Pts	64-Core 4,586 284% 4,586 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia T400 4GB 551 User benchmarks, average bench 18% Dell(1028 1613) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.27 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Lighting 22.1 Reflection 24.3 Parallax 20.1 18% 22.2 fps	MRender 25.8 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 22.8 19% 22.7 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme PC SN810 WD 2TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 343% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2523 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2461 2523 2201 3225 3242 3264 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	411% Outstanding	Read 3,119 Write 1297 Mixed 2,432 SusWrite 2,819 541% 2,417 MB/s	4K Read 52.1 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 57.5 212% 73.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,206 DQ Write 1,024 DQ Mixed 1,143 849% 1,124 MB/s
Poor: 181% ↑ This bench: 411% Great: 435%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150 24,380 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 466GB free Firmware: 7D SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 102 117 117 116 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 110 Write 115 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 116 72% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150 24,380 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 466GB free Firmware: 7D SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 96 111 110 110 116 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 105 Write 110 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 109 68% 93.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150 24,380 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 466GB free Firmware: 7D SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 97 112 111 112 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 108 Write 110 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 110 69% 95 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150 24,380 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 466GB free Firmware: 7D SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 103 112 115 115 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 111 Write 116 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 114 72% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150 24,380 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 466GB free Firmware: 7D SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 98 105 108 109 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 103 Write 107 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 107 67% 92.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150 24,380 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 466GB free Firmware: 7D SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 105 114 117 117 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 111 Write 117 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 116 73% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M321R8GA0BB0-CQKVG 16x31.9GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 382% 16 of 16 slots used 511GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	387% Outstanding	MC Read 142 MC Write 193 MC Mixed 167 478% 167 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 15.8 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 94.4 42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 374% ↑ This bench: 387% Great: 387%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Precision 7960 Tower Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 178%

UFO

Desktop

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation

Workstation 278%

UFO

System: Dell Precision 7960 Tower

CPU
Xeon w9-3495XIntelBench 87%, 39 samples	7x
Xeon w7-3465XIntelBench 88%, 23 samples	6x
Xeon w7-3455IntelBench 88%, 20 samples	3x

GPU
RTX A6000NvidiaBench 205%, 738 samples	6x
T400 4GBNvidiaBench 18%, 551 samples	5x
RTX 6000 Ada GenerationNvidiaBench 292%, 64 samples	4x

SSD
PC SN810 WD 2TBNvmeBench 343%, 16 samples	6x
PC801 SK hy 1TBNvmeBench 320%, 76 samples	3x
KXG80ZN84T09 NVM 4TBNvmeBench 347%, 10 samples	3x

RAM
HMCG88AEBRA115N 4x31.8GBUnknownBench 249%, 6 samples	3x
M321R8GA0BB0-CQKVG 16x31.9GBUnknownBench 382%, 3 samples	3x
HMCG94AEBRA109N 16x31.9GBUnknownBench 397%, 5 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback