Asrock H61M-DGS

Performance Results

Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 65%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 04:14
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 154
57% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 246
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 20.5
17% 19.8 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 16.9
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst Elite 120GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 213 219 228 99 139 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.6% Above average
Read 217
Write 220
Mixed 204
SusWrite 182
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 27.7
77% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 81
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 136
104% 136 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 91%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB
514GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 64 105 77 130 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 139
Write 135
Mixed 43.4
SusWrite 90.9
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.6
200% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G16002 Kingston 99U5474-026.A00LF 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.8% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.6
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.1
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-DGS Builds (Compare 1,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop 60%
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS - $68

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback