TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock Z370 PRO4/OEM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics173% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z370 PRO4/OEM  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 00:34
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 135
2-Core 257
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 813
80% 656 Pts
64-Core 1,064
66% 1,064 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 92.9%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$550
Gigabyte(1458 40EE)
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
173% Outstanding
Lighting 228
Reflection 254
Parallax 257
186% 246 fps
MRender 348
Gravity 239
Splatting 186
203% 258 fps
Poor: 162% ↑
This bench: 173%
 Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR045 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1720 89 625 190 84 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,150
Write 1,836
Mixed 1,351
SusWrite 466
271% 1,201 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 68.9
236% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,006
DQ Write 710
DQ Mixed 888
655% 868 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 186%
 Great: 253%
Team T2531TB 1TB
215GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 450 446 463 466 467 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 283
Write 105
Mixed 104
SusWrite 448
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 26.4
89% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 56.1
DQ Write 80.8
DQ Mixed 111
72% 82.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 69.6%
 Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
253GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 63 64 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 63.1
Write 68.7
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 62.3
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 36.1%
 Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4U0832160B 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 28.7
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 30.4
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 96%
 Great: 113%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z370 PRO4/OEM Builds (Compare 210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 PRO4/OEM

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel  $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples35x
Core i7-8700KIntel  $175Bench 88%, 746,287 samples29x
Core i5-9600KIntel  $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples26x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples17x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples14x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples12x
SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial  $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples8x
CS900 240GBPNY  $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples6x
CS900 120GBPNY  $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples5x
RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 1x8GBCorsairBench 43%, 742 samples7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples6x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples6x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback