Asus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 171%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive331% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 15:31
Run Duration312 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 181
2-Core 360
112% 210 Pts
4-Core 700
8-Core 1,361
122% 1,031 Pts
64-Core 2,879
178% 2,879 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
MSI(1462 373E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3751 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 166
Parallax 165
140% 167 fps
MRender 205
Gravity 143
Splatting 126
125% 158 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 128%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$58
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2878 2878 2969 1354 763 692 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 3,508
Write 2,195
Mixed 2,152
SusWrite 1,922
545% 2,444 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 51.6
165% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 588
DQ Write 416
DQ Mixed 485
367% 496 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 331%
Great: 463%
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 1TB
412GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1902 1088 976 1016 1018 1007 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,353
Write 1,761
Mixed 1,510
SusWrite 1168
328% 1,448 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 44.3
137% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 615
DQ Write 433
DQ Mixed 531
394% 526 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 192%
Great: 287%
CT500P3PSSD8 500GB
372GB free
Firmware: P9CR409
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1812 1830 1813 1448 496 555 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1537
Write 1,831
Mixed 1,540
SusWrite 1,326
352% 1,559 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 52.3
170% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 578
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 505
372% 492 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 217%
Great: 315%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 106 108 107 109 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 87.3
Write 131
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 98.2
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.3
155% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Basic 5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 90 85 92 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 69.9
Write 106
Mixed 37
SusWrite 86.9
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.5
135% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 65%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
931GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 119 126 91 123 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 73.6
Write 116
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 120
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$103
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 104
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 42.4
178% 62.3 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 40.1
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 160%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING Builds (Compare 2,530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $785
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback