PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P7P55D-E (all builds) |
Memory | 8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120626 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | May 25 '23 at 11:38 |
Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
Run User | HND-User |
Background CPU | 47% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X3430
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
|
54.1%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 885C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
3 256GB SSD 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0426A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 61 61 62 63 MB/s
|
35.3%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST3500631NS 500GB
191GB free
Firmware: 4AEN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 61 62 63 63 MB/s
|
36.6%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
146GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 74 73 72 73 MB/s
|
54.2%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
146GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 126 127 129 132 MB/s
|
74.8%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
|
23.8%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 258x |
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 156x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 142x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 70x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 45x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 43x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $159 |