HP ProDesk 400 G3 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G3 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8061
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151013
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 22 '23 at 11:00
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 209
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 565
57% 463 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 3688) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 37
Parallax 52.2
31% 42.5 fps
MRender 49.2
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 39.6
37% 45.8 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Txrui X550 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2818E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 358 389 404 396 394 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 476
Write 399
Mixed 383
SusWrite 387
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 15.2
108% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 19.6
65% 136 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x0889] 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 23.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 23
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G3 MT Builds (Compare 1,139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G3 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback