Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel N95 1,057 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Memory 35.1 1-Core 75 2-Core 155 46% 88.3 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 268 30% 234 Pts	64-Core 260 16% 260 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 811 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(1E50 8023) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3417 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.34% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 6.2 Parallax 4.2 3% 4.7 fps	MRender 8.7 Gravity 6.6 Splatting 1 4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.34% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SEP4256Q-A0 256GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 132% 210GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBI01108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 330 389 383 348 364 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 383 Write 332 Mixed 396 SusWrite 351 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 29.9 4K Mixed 12.4 58% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 407 DQ Write 381 DQ Mixed 325 263% 371 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 233%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FR 1x8GB 269 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 11.5 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 6.1 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 226 18% 226 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
N95IntelBench 47%, 1,057 samples	18x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 811 samples	18x

SSD
OM8SEP4256Q-A0 256GBKingstonBench 132%, 25 samples	10x
XP1000F512G 512GBForeseeBench 174%, 94 samples	6x
CT1000P3SSD8 1TBBench 268%, 44,174 samples	2x

RAM
CT8G4SFS832A.M8FR 1x8GBCrucialBench 44%, 269 samples	8x
Longsys Electronics Co Ltd FD4AS3200CQGZE 1x16GBShenzhenBench 44%, 15 samples	8x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 3200 C22 1x31GBCorsairBench 41%, 112 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16