Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel N95 1,057 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Memory 36.7 1-Core 67.1 2-Core 130 42% 77.9 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 187 22% 168 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 811 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(1E50 8023) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3677 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.37% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 6.2 Parallax 4.1 3% 4.6 fps	MRender 6.3 Gravity 4.6 Splatting 5.2 4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.37% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CYX-SSD-S1000 512GB 334 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 392GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN09787 SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 335 337 189 127 130 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 327 Write 335 Mixed 309 SusWrite 246 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 25.7 4K Mixed 24.5 70% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 279 194% 241 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KINSOTIN16GB2666MHZ 1x16GB 512 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	29% Poor	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 11.1 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 185 22% 185 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	23	2	60	15.5"	1280 720	BOE0B07

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
N95IntelBench 47%, 1,057 samples	63x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 811 samples	63x

SSD
CYX-SSD-S1000 512GBBench 83%, 334 samples	54x
NS512GSSD340 512GBBench 73%, 201 samples	5x
CNF80V51M00-512G 512GBBiwinBench 65%, 10 samples	3x

RAM
KINSOTIN16GB2666MHZ 1x16GBUnknownBench 33%, 512 samples	55x
DDR4-SO-16GB2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 38%, 8 samples	6x
JM3200HSE-32G 1x31GBTranscendBench 45%, 94 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16