Medion ERAZER P46005 MD34037/C590

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 months ago, 14 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 11 months ago.

System	Medion ERAZER P46005 MD34037/C590 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-EM2
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180305
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 16 '23 at 00:57
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$92 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 92.6 2-Core 194 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 379 50% 375 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Elitegroup(1019 1041) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.6% Poor	Lighting 34.7 Reflection 38 Parallax 35.6 28% 36.1 fps	MRender 36.7 Gravity 36.5 Splatting 25.7 26% 33 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
240gb SSD 240GB 2,356 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 259 73 124 111 111 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 438 Write 372 Mixed 255 SusWrite 160 68% 306 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 9.6 76% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 12.7 50% 108 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 93%
ST332082 0AS 320GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 129GB free, PID 070c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 38 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Read 63.2 Write 25.5 Mixed 30.1 SusWrite 37.6 48% 39.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB 22,600 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 12.1 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 10.1 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER P46005 MD34037/C590 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Medion ERAZER P46005 MD34037/C590

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $92Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 240GB240gbBench 60%, 2,356 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $151

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16