Galaxy B550 GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 190%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 215%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGalaxy B550 GAMER  (all builds)
MotherboardGALAX B550 GAMER
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '23 at 17:17
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 80.6
1-Core 177
2-Core 352
107% 203 Pts
4-Core 687
8-Core 1,311
119% 999 Pts
64-Core 2,246
139% 2,246 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
184% Outstanding
Lighting 265
Reflection 238
Parallax 270
216% 257 fps
MRender 309
Gravity 228
Splatting 169
185% 235 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 184%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S41 512GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB421D57
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 72 187 216 215 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,895
Write 515
Mixed 552
SusWrite 206
224% 1,042 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 80.2
258% 95.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,195
DQ Write 442
DQ Mixed 490
449% 709 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 246%
Great: 314%
Xraydisk 1TB SSD 1TB
675GB free
Firmware: HPS2428I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 449 447 449 349 362 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 450
Mixed 403
SusWrite 418
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 14
125% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 16.3
82% 185 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 272%
SSD 720GB 720GB
169GB free
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 77 473 446 464 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 452
Write 14
Mixed 21
SusWrite 248
40% 184 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
83% 18.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 91%
SSD 1TB 1TB
286GB free
Firmware: HPS2818C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 409 421 410 420 421 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 490
Write 444
Mixed 385
SusWrite 419
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 13
118% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 14.8
68% 149 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 209%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
217GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 151 149 151 150 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 134
Write 135
Mixed 101
SusWrite 151
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
79GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 84 85 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 80.2
Write 75.9
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 84.3
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 55.1
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 35.5
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 33.8
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 110%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550 GAMER Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Galaxy B550 GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback