Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '23 at 11:02
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 188
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 458
50% 396 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 7.6
6% 7.37 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 7
Splatting 10.8
8% 8.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.5% Average
Lighting 51.2
Reflection 66.9
Parallax 56.9
42% 58.3 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 55.1
Splatting 52.4
47% 58.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 1TB 1TB
767GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 333 29 12 9.9 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 437
Write 313
Mixed 342
SusWrite 121
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 25.7
92% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 50.2
83% 155 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JHD2400U1716JY 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 18.6
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback